Skip to main content

Government Involvement, Law and Individual Rights

What happens when the government bails out or gives money to an individual or corporation for any reason.   There is usually a motivation that is justifiable on the surface by some popular event or sentiment.  But what is the constitutional standard on which it is based as envisioned by the the nation's founders?  The most common rational for government officials agreeing to participate in a private venture is economic development.  Isn't this in reality a way for the private enterprise to pass their risk to taxpayers?

Do today's politicians know what the standard and purpose of the constitution is?  Do they even care?   Public officials at all levels of government should be limited in their power.  That was and is the purpose of the constitution.  Of the various levels of government the federal level should have the least power.

There are two basic types of law that governments operate from.  Rulers law where all laws and rights come from the monarch or ruling body and peoples law where the people authorize the laws according to the rights afforded them by God. America was founded with the idea of people's law based on the philosophy of individual liberties and inalienable rights are gifts.  Ruler's law is just what it sounds like.  Someone making the rules they like and their subjects have no real rights to speak of. They are arbitrary and can even be whimsical depending on the monarch. The constitutional nature of a law as we know it depends on the effect it has on the liberty or rights of the citizens.  Does it infringe on individual's rights or take their property?

A king or government oligarchy acting with usurped authority makes laws by decree or whim according to no set of prescribed principles.  Because they have control of an army or police force they can enforce their decrees with threats of violence and retaliation against any rebellion.  In the case of ruler's law be it one or several, they will do what ever the bounds of their surroundings will allow them in order to retain their positions of power and authority.   A king will kill, politicians will lie and make promises they have no power to really keep and hope that no one notices.  The latter takes advantage of the gullibility of the populace and the former doesn't care.

In the second place politicians have no authority to give money to anyone that isn't applied on an equal standard to all citizens of the body they govern.  In the first place they have no money to give. The government has no money of its own at all.  Of course they do print money at the federal level that has no real value other than the confidence we give it. That course of action however has serious consequences when done under the wrong circumstances. Other than that they have to take it under threat of force through a collection agency.  Any government involvement in business or individual affairs may be sponsored by the people's representatives however if they were upholding their oath they would not do it.

When any civic leader at any level of government uses the citizen's money to support any type of business and excludes others they are acting in a manner that creates special favors.  When they justify their actions putting the citizen's funds at risk they are violating their stewardship of their power.  Why do they think they can speculate with public money ?

If the projects they promote would not be undertaken by any group of serious minded investors why should the government do it?  The reason business owners seek this arrangement is so they can limit their risks. If one community won't accommodate them they go to the next. There is usually some form of compensation to the politicians that help them accomplish their purposes.  It just may not ever be known or be known and still be legal.  

We should not forget that the politician took an oath to uphold the constitution. If he or she knows little or nothing about it; what happens?  Does that excuse him or her or us?  That depends on how quick you want to lose your liberties and rights as they are mortgaged and taken away by degrees through taxes and and expanded bureaucracy.  One step at a time year after year until decades have past, we find ourselves mired in layers of administrative law and spending patterns financed with debt and few in the citizenry willing or knowing how to reverse the trend.

Popular posts from this blog

James Madison, Essay on Property

James Madison, National Gazette March 29, 1792

This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."
In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.  In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandise, or money is called his property.
In the latter sense, a man has property in his opinions and the free communication of them.
He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them. He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.
He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his ri…

The Freedom To Succeed

As we live our lives and and search for meaning and significance we can only hope that we somehow we see what it means to be free and live in a place where we can make choices and find fulfillment through those choices. 

About two years ago I was a guest attending a veterans committee meeting at my local association of Realtors.  The discussion revolved around events that would recognize the the men and women that had given service to our country. In many organizations veterans and military personnel are recognized for their willingness to be a part of the force that is ready at anytime to rise and defend the causes of freedom that are unique to the United States.
I think we want honor their willingness to take whatever unknown events lie ahead in their service and the discipline of preparing for those events including placing themselves in harms way and the possibility of giving their life in that service.
I have read many books and attended many "success" seminars, as do many…

The Pursuit of Personal Development and Eternal Perspective

February 1, 2014

Personal development is a huge business. Gurus abound.  Most people want to get better at something or reduce stress in their life and need a teacher. Parts of truth can be shared in many ways and by many people.  Sometimes a person just needs to hear how great and unique they really are as an individual.  This can be a stepping stone to understanding one's potential.  The gurus are seeking to unlock performance and free people from the inhibitions that limit them.
Life coaches have proliferated in recent decades in part because corporations and individuals must compete in society. All these teachers can do is sell you on the idea of becoming better.  They do this either by using themselves or others as an example.  Some know how to teach certain aspects of it very well.

How well do they apply their own teachings? Success is really so subjective.  A teacher/coach/guru may have unsettled personal relationships yet achieve financial success and social status.  Are they…