Skip to main content

Republic or Democracy and the ideals of freedom

What percentage of Americans know the difference between a republic and a democracy.  We pledge allegiance to the flag and to the republic for which it stands.  Politicians ofter refer to our country as a democracy.  What is our country?  The founders made it clear that we are a REPUBLIC.  So lets try and understand the difference.

We might do well to first ask ourselves again what the purpose of government is.  What is the purpose of government?   If you read the Declaration of Independence it is to protect our unalienable rights.  The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness among them.  It is based on the idea that all men (people) are created equal.  To not have their rights infringed upon.  The government should get its "just" powers from the consent of the governed.  

"The Constitution was written to protect the rights of individuals and limit the powers of government. In other words, it was intended to preserve liberty. Not only did the Founders not intend for public policy to be determined democratically, they actively tried to design their new government to prevent public policy from being directed by the demands of its citizens. They recognized that liberty could be compromised by democracy, and that the will of the majority had the potential to be just as tyrannical as a king or dictator."

The government has no power that that an individual does not have other than those enumerated and granted to it by law.  That law is the constitution so long as we uphold it and the politicians follow it.  To say that a republic and a democracy are similar in every aspect except one can be explained as follows.  In a republic the sovereignty is in each individual.  In a democracy the sovereignty is in the group. 

Where a true democracy is the government there are no representatives.  Democracy means power of the people.  The idea is that at least politically all people be equal.   Each with a voice and a vote.  The problem with this type of system is that the people generally lack at least one and most often several things.  Knowledge of the problems, understanding of the problems, time to think about the problems and time to do something about the problems. The principle shortcomings of a democracy are that it lacks safeguards for the rights of the individual and it lends itself to "mob rule".  The rights of the minority are over ruled by any majority that might develop.

This is can be the case with elected representatives in a republic.  When the people see this happening they must vote them out.  Another point of truth is that many people just don't care about anything outside of their own pursuits until they are seriously disrupted.  The reason for havin a representative form of government is so that the citizens can pursue their creative capacities to benefit themselves and their fellow human beings and not be burdened with the responsibilities of carrying out the protection of their rights.   If they fail to monitor their elected officials they will eventually find themselves without those rights being protected.

When the founders set about to define government to protect the rights endowed by our creator they had studied all systems of government and knew something of the consequences of the various types.  History was studied and debated.  Debates today center on equality for everyone that thinks they are not being treated equally and many laws have been passed to try and create such a state.  These laws are however for the most part infringing on the freedom of others and violate natural laws of opportunity, ambition or morality.

The aim of the Founding Fathers was to allow freedom to be protected.   The idea of a republic is to allow all citizens to have an interest and say in the affairs of government.  In a democracy where the  majority is half plus one there is greater potential for mood swings.  Once a majority develops it gains power over the rest of the people and rights are soon disregarded.

To stop the infringement on the rights of individuals requires a constitution that dictates the order of the government with checks and balances in itself and ultimate authority resting with the people by their power to vote.  The purpose of a republic is to control the majority and protect those rights of any minority which are supported by justice and natural law.

Often the terms of democracy, democratic republic, representative democracy, republic and empire have been used in describing governments yet did not have the elements necessary to be classified as such.  The general lack of understanding of these terms makes it easy for politicians to  use the term "democracy" and not be corrected as few study the system of government our republic was intended to be.

Popular posts from this blog

James Madison, Essay on Property

James Madison, National Gazette March 29, 1792

This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."
In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.  In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandise, or money is called his property.
In the latter sense, a man has property in his opinions and the free communication of them.
He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them. He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.
He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his ri…

The Freedom To Succeed

As we live our lives and and search for meaning and significance we can only hope that we somehow we see what it means to be free and live in a place where we can make choices and find fulfillment through those choices. 

About two years ago I was a guest attending a veterans committee meeting at my local association of Realtors.  The discussion revolved around events that would recognize the the men and women that had given service to our country. In many organizations veterans and military personnel are recognized for their willingness to be a part of the force that is ready at anytime to rise and defend the causes of freedom that are unique to the United States.
I think we want honor their willingness to take whatever unknown events lie ahead in their service and the discipline of preparing for those events including placing themselves in harms way and the possibility of giving their life in that service.
I have read many books and attended many "success" seminars, as do many…

The Pursuit of Personal Development and Eternal Perspective

February 1, 2014

Personal development is a huge business. Gurus abound.  Most people want to get better at something or reduce stress in their life and need a teacher. Parts of truth can be shared in many ways and by many people.  Sometimes a person just needs to hear how great and unique they really are as an individual.  This can be a stepping stone to understanding one's potential.  The gurus are seeking to unlock performance and free people from the inhibitions that limit them.
Life coaches have proliferated in recent decades in part because corporations and individuals must compete in society. All these teachers can do is sell you on the idea of becoming better.  They do this either by using themselves or others as an example.  Some know how to teach certain aspects of it very well.

How well do they apply their own teachings? Success is really so subjective.  A teacher/coach/guru may have unsettled personal relationships yet achieve financial success and social status.  Are they…