The Clinton agenda and platform can't be built on such grounds and the eventual removal of anything with the word moral in it is their objective. There are those that judge religious liberty as a hindrance to their agenda and Hillary is their representative.
Their values reflect the whimsical fallacies, fantasies and philosophies of men and women like Margaret Sanger, Hugh Hefner, Dr. Ruth, Howard Stern, Bob Guccione and bastions of entertainers that act them out on the big and small screens. These exemplify their moral values. Their political values come from others just as damaging to freedom.
Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood proposed to do away with poverty through sterilization and abortion. She is one of Hillary's heroes.
Sanger's vision, 100 years running is one that Hillary passionately pursues and believes in. It has done nothing to reduce poverty with some 60 million abortions in the USA since the mid 70's. This isn't about women's health. It has become a form of birth control because of the unpopularity of self-control.
The narrative of sex that the Clintons and its other advocates use has induced a generation or more to objectify both sex and women. While Trump has obviously been part of that crowd he doesn't promote the platform that has incorporated them. Hillary hypocritically decries the objectification of women and yet her very values have made her pretentious crusade plausible. She claims to defend women's rights on one hand and demeans womanhood on the other.
Bill Clinton has served as a proverbial role model of such behaviors, and he was elected president of the nation. This kind of leadership is not the solution, it is the problem.
I remember the “Make love not war” mantra of my youth. And...the result. A war on the unborn with 60 million casualties in the USA alone. The liberal Clintonian spin says guns and bullets need to be controlled but give abortion doctors a full magazine of killing instruments because sex is harmless.
They veil their arguments in vague references to protecting choice or a freedom. It may be the only area where they seem concerned about your freedom as they take it away in so many other areas.
Religious freedom that might invite people to consider some moral ideals for real sexual freedom, freedom from broken hearts and lives. This cannot be tolerated by the liberal platform and its narrative. Hillary Clinton is the spokesperson for the platform and drives the narrative. She wants us to think that equality is measured by government statistics and growing welfare rolls, not human opportunity and productive service. Her politics are grounded in using government as force.
The dialogue of bloggers and politicians like Hillary Clinton echos with words like, choice, women's health, reproductive rights, human rights and other freedom sounding phrases. They want us to believe that they are protecting women and children. This is just a clever fallacy and they demonize those that point this out. This philosophy fabricates the illusion that government can do something to solve societal breakdown and it can't.
The only way to have peace based in love in this world is to have peace at home. The only way to have it at home is to have trust in relationships that create life and nurture it. Abortion is not the result of loving and nurturing relationships.
Abortion isn't the problem though, it is a symptom of the problem along with many others that establish attitudes that disregard the importance of respect and trust in human interpersonal and intimate relationships.
What we really need and should want is the ability for average Americans to provide for their families in a secure environment and knowing our labors won’t be swindled away by scheming politicians.
We know Hillary is a lifetime and aspiring politician, Donald Trump knows how they work. He is the most reasonable choice for freedom in America at this point to stop out of control government and the eroding of fundamental values of liberty.