Skip to main content

Infringement, Unalienable Rights and Individual Liberties

To begin this observation I would say that our current state of government in the United States of America is one that has all but left the constitution that founded it.   True it looks the same with three branches of government but they no longer act as a check on each other's powers and have continually usurped the power of the states that created it.   In fact some have called the vast administrative bureaucracy that manages the extensive reach of government a fourth  branch of government.  It is full of officials, none of which are elected, who can make rules that have the force and effect of law.


The people that have occupied federal public office either by election or by appointment have come to operate with complete disregard for the principles that established it and their obligation to check each other's actions according to it.  There are a few voices calling attention to the situation in congress however their effect is yet to have much persuasive force.  


Laws are now made and have been made for decades and even centuries without full review as to what the founding documents and their authors intended. By failing to follow the intent of the founders, the principles that established their original design have been and are being violated.

This government was one of the few if not the only such established on purpose after studying history and government and economics to a degree which had not been attempted by a new nation freed from tyranny through war and hardship.  


We have attempted to help others implement it but only with limited success as we have failed to preserve it the way it was intended.   The desire for freedom that existed in the early 1700's and before only appeared in limited times and places before that but never with full fruition of written protections for property, individual rights and controlling the government.

Identifying individual liberties and unalienable rights as being from God was the impetus for creating a constitution for the ages. That is to indicate that there are eternal principles at work.  There was no self serving interest other than to be free.  The idea was to create a document that established a government for the purpose of keeping it from making unnecessary laws and protecting the liberty of the people.  


The constitution is the supreme law of the land yet the politician's in their lust for power have found a way to all but ignore it when it comes to creating new laws and spending money it does not have.  Law makers now and in the past have acted as if they had authority to do what ever their whims could devise and no one challenged them sufficiently to stop it.  An oligarchy was born and has continued to flourish on a foundation of corruption and vice. Many of these changes occured though the ammendment process in 1913 with the 16 and 17th ammendments.

When unalienable rights are threatened or infringed upon then the law under consideration is probably unconstitutional especially from a federal level.  The bill of rights outlines some of the rights specifically but it was never intended to enumerate every single right that might exist.  To pick and choose from the document to justify creating new laws is to ignore the intent by which it was crafted.  The founding fathers very thoroughly debated and then recorded in their letters and writings the intent of their founding documents. To violate that spirit of freedom is to act against the constitution.


How is an infringement on one's rights to be determined?   If a person has property duly acquired then no one else has a right to it.  That is the basic understanding of unalienable. The founders clearly explained that natural law is the basis for law.  It comes from God and cannot be violated without consequence.


Government can have no right or power except that which the people grant to it and they cannot grant any power except they possess it.  If it acts outside of such principle then it is usurping power it was not intended to have if rights are to be protected.


The Ten Commandments are the most basic of guides that demonstrate actions that lead to or are actual infringements on rights.  They are based on eternal principles and given by God. They outline the laws of God for the good and betterment of human interaction.  


Mankind cannot violate the commandments without incurring the natural consequences and penalties that are attached to them.  Likewise there are attendant blessings when they are followed.  All who know them will be judged by them. 


Those in government will likewise be held accountable by the standard of freedom and truth whether it be a king, president, legislature or parliament.   When public officials by the power of their vote seize the property of citizens through taxes they act outside the of natural rights.   

The right to keep one's property and earnings should be held inviolate.   If the commandment teaches not to steal there should not be an exception.  Politicians have made them selves the exception and confiscate property by majority vote. It is known as legal plunder.

Popular posts from this blog

Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and Freedom in America

Our freedoms are rooted in the values of family life. The generational commitments to being good citizens are taught at home. Do we want leaders that preserve them or not?
Trump may not represent the moral high ground but he isn't trying to tear it down or remove it as part of his platform. It is easy to mark a public figure at their worst and hold it over their head and some fanatics will. Trump's lewd confessions and infidelities are not excusable but they are forgivable if he has changed. To not vote for him will give Hillary dynamite and a bulldozer get rid of moral ground altogether. 

The Clinton agenda and platform can't be built on such grounds and the eventual removal of anything with the word moral in it is their objective. There are those that judge religious liberty as a hindrance to their agenda and Hillary is their representative.
Where do the values of leaders like Hillary and Bill Clinton and many others come from? Who are the cultural trendsetters that h…

James Madison, Essay on Property

Property
James Madison, National Gazette March 29, 1792

This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."
In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.  In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandise, or money is called his property.
In the latter sense, a man has property in his opinions and the free communication of them.
He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them. He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.
He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his ri…

The Freedom To Succeed

As we live our lives and and search for meaning and significance we can only hope that we somehow we see what it means to be free and live in a place where we can make choices and find fulfillment through those choices. 


About two years ago I was a guest attending a veterans committee meeting at my local association of Realtors.  The discussion revolved around events that would recognize the the men and women that had given service to our country. In many organizations veterans and military personnel are recognized for their willingness to be a part of the force that is ready at anytime to rise and defend the causes of freedom that are unique to the United States.
I think we want honor their willingness to take whatever unknown events lie ahead in their service and the discipline of preparing for those events including placing themselves in harms way and the possibility of giving their life in that service.
I have read many books and attended many "success" seminars, as do many…